<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>IIS and Kerberos Part 9 - Cross Forest Delegation scenario with UPN suffix routing</title><link>http://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2009/02/25/21173.aspx</link><description>As an extension of the previous article on Cross Forest (or Cross Domain) Kerberos Authentication this article examines how to configure cross forest authentication and delegation when users are accessing an arbitrary website URL. In this scenario we</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 (Build: 60809.935)</generator><item><title>Ken Schaefer : IIS and Kerberos Part 8 - a simple cross Forest/Domain delegation scenario</title><link>http://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2009/02/25/21173.aspx#21178</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:32:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e0e31441-78b9-4457-b9b0-6f7906e03e71:21178</guid><dc:creator>Ken Schaefer : IIS and Kerberos Part 8 - a simple cross Forest/Domain delegation scenario</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2008/06/28/17805.aspx"&gt;http://adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2008/06/28/17805.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Vidar's Musings ?? The mother lode for IIS, Kerberos and IWA information</title><link>http://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2009/02/25/21173.aspx#21324</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:55:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e0e31441-78b9-4457-b9b0-6f7906e03e71:21324</guid><dc:creator>Vidar's Musings ?? The mother lode for IIS, Kerberos and IWA information</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.kongsli.net/nblog/2009/03/06/the-mother-lode-for-iis-kerberos-and-iwa-information/"&gt;http://www.kongsli.net/nblog/2009/03/06/the-mother-lode-for-iis-kerberos-and-iwa-information/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: IIS and Kerberos Part 9 - Cross Forest Delegation scenario with UPN suffix routing</title><link>http://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2009/02/25/21173.aspx#24050</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:14:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e0e31441-78b9-4457-b9b0-6f7906e03e71:24050</guid><dc:creator>nopliiz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What would be the resolution for OWA in this scenario? Woudl there be any differences between a standard IIS site you explained here and OWA?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IIS and Kerberos Part 9 - Cross Forest Delegation scenario with UPN suffix routing</title><link>http://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2009/02/25/21173.aspx#25024</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:26:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e0e31441-78b9-4457-b9b0-6f7906e03e71:25024</guid><dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi nopliiz,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't think there'd be any differences here. OWA is just using standard Windows authentication routines under the covers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>